The information shared within the judicial committee is not entrusted to the elders in their role as counselors, but in their role as members of the judicial committee. , In this case, there is no confidentiality obligation that is part of the relationship of trust that mental health and care providers have with the person asking for help. They are not spiritual counselors at that time. No confidentiality obligationĪccording to the court, there is no right of nondisclosure for elders of the Jehovah’s Witnesses who are members of a judicial committee of that community. In its opinion, the right of non-disclosure does not apply in this case. The court in Zwolle delivered its judgment on Friday. According to the lawyer of Jehovah’s Witnesses Netherlands, the searches and seizures were unlawful because the elders, as religious servants, could invoke their right of non-disclosure. Last month, a complaint from the Jehovah’s administration against the seizure of pastoral records in those raids was handled in the court in Zwolle. The national headquarters of the faith society in Emmen and homes of elders in Assen and Hoogezand were investigated by the police in November 2018 on behalf of the Public Prosecution Service in the context of investigations into alleged sexual abuse by a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Assen. Originally published in Dutch by Danielle Molenaar on Dagblad van het Noorden on May 8, 2020 That was determined by the court in Zwolle on Friday. Elders of Jehovah’s Witnesses from the Northern Netherlands cannot invoke their right of non-disclosure as clergy in the criminal investigation of sexual abuse by a Jehovah’s member from Assen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |